Guillain Barré
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré: Comportamiento Actual En El Perú Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Current Behavior In Peru.
Síndrome de Guillain Barré imitando Muerte Encefálica.
Guillain Barré Syndrome is a neurological disease frequently admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, especially if there is associated hemodynamic or ventilatory compromise. Brain death is the irreversible cessation of all functions of Central Nervous System, and rarely, Guillain Barré Syndrome can mimick it, with subsequent recovery in the next few days or weeks. We report a case admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, with this type of evolution.
Leer artículo completo
Síndrome de Guillaín-Barré. Experiencia en el INNN. Búsqueda de Factores del Mal Pronóstico.
Objectives: This article describe the Guillaín-Barré syndrome in a Mexican population. Materials and Methods: We review the charts of 40 patients admitted to the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velásco Suárez” in México City, and we contact them by telephone in order to know their current outome. Results: We find pathological antecedents in 62% of patients. The clinical patern was classical in 62.5%. The functional grade at admission was II in 17.5%, III in 55% and IV in 27.5%. Electrophisiologic tests showed 72% of secundary axonal dammage, of them, 35% was severe. Twenty-two patients (55%) were admited to the Intensive Care Unite, with 70% of them requiring mechnical ventilation, and with a mean admission time of 17.8 days. 22.5% of patientes were treated with immunoglobulins, 7.5% underwent plasma exchange and 70% did not recive specific treatment. Average total hospitalization was 31.8 days. The twelve months outcome was good (Class A) in 77.5%, regular (Class B) in 15%, and bad (Class C) in 7.5%. Conclusions: The electrophysiologic pattern was directly related with the outcome. This was perhaps the same situation of the time of admition and later management with the outcome. The specific treatment and the outcome did not show any correlation. In the group of Class A patients, 50% were treated with IG vs 37.5% without treatment and 12.5% with plasma exchange. Thie study is limited by its retrospestive characteristic and by the lack of disponibility to specific treatment.